Recently, media reports said that the Nanjing Intermediate People's Court will begin the introduction of intelligent robots in 2017 and set up a robot project team to appoint “robot project leader†to improve the quality of case handling and efficiency. In response to the report, the Nanjing Intermediate People's Court issued an official statement yesterday, saying that the report was false, and that the so-called “robot project team†had never had an intention to establish it, nor had it appointed a “robot project leaderâ€. As robots become more intelligent, the range of robots that replace or assist humans has become more widespread. In the legal field, robots also started to play an important role. Previously, Baker Hostetler, a US law firm, had hired a robotic lawyer, ROSS, based on the machine learning technology provided by IBM Watson. It can automatically retrieve a database of legal documents and find answers that match the people's questions. ROSS has helped to deal with a bankruptcy case. Compared with before, the task that originally required several assistants to spend several hours can now only require one assistant to spend a small part of the time. 
Of course, robots can only provide support and assistance for lawyers. To play the role of lawyer, it must solve some core legal issues, such as whether it is possible to model laws automatically or abstractly without relying on nature. Language description. In other words, knowledge maps are crucial. However, this does not indicate that the prospects of legal robots are unacceptable. There are investigating agencies that have investigated the assistant lawyers of 320 law firms in the United States on the issue of whether artificial intelligence can replace lawyers within 10 years after 5 years. As a result, 47% of the management legal counsel and 37% of new lawyers (one year in qualifying as a lawyer) all answered in the affirmative, and 13.5% of the lawyers also believed that they would be replaced by artificial intelligence. The Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court stated in its statement that the judiciary is a job with experience and value judgement. No smart machine or software can completely replace the judge’s work. It can only provide judges with case support and assistance. In other words, robots will not be judged now, but the robot is not smart enough. The future is still possible. The following is an official statement issued by the Intermediate People’s Court of Nanjing: Recently, media reported that according to the “Head of Robot Project of the Nanjing Intermediate People’s Courtâ€, our institute decided to “introduce intelligent robots†in 2017 to improve the quality of case handling and case efficiency. . After investigation, our hospital has never been set up, and we have not planned to set up a "Robot Project Department" yet. We have not appointed a "robot project leader." The reporter’s report was false. In recent years, our institute has continued to strengthen the construction of informatization, giving full play to the important role of informatization construction in serving the people, serving the trials, and administering the administration of justice. However, we also deeply realize that the judiciary is a job with experience and value judgment. No smarter machine or software can completely replace the judge's work. It can only provide judges with case support and assistance. In order to promote their products, individual companies fabricated the project of introducing “legal robots†in our institute, and also told reporters that the “project department†was set up in our institute, which caused a lot of controversy. Here, our hospital solemnly declares: 1. Our hospital does not have this so-called "legal robot" project, has not been established, currently has no intention to set up a "project department", and has not appointed a "project department head." 2. Our institute has formulated the "Three-Year Development Plan for Nanjing Court Information Construction (2017-2019)", which is promoting the transformation and upgrading of informatization construction, striving to provide the people with more quality, efficient, convenient and low-cost justice. service. 3. During the process of informatization construction in our institute, we will strictly follow the regulations for bidding for social service projects, and eliminate enterprises that have taken unfair competition as a rule to win the bid.
Of course, robots can only provide support and assistance for lawyers. To play the role of lawyer, it must solve some core legal issues, such as whether it is possible to model laws automatically or abstractly without relying on nature. Language description. In other words, knowledge maps are crucial. However, this does not indicate that the prospects of legal robots are unacceptable. There are investigating agencies that have investigated the assistant lawyers of 320 law firms in the United States on the issue of whether artificial intelligence can replace lawyers within 10 years after 5 years. As a result, 47% of the management legal counsel and 37% of new lawyers (one year in qualifying as a lawyer) all answered in the affirmative, and 13.5% of the lawyers also believed that they would be replaced by artificial intelligence. The Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court stated in its statement that the judiciary is a job with experience and value judgement. No smart machine or software can completely replace the judge’s work. It can only provide judges with case support and assistance. In other words, robots will not be judged now, but the robot is not smart enough. The future is still possible. The following is an official statement issued by the Intermediate People’s Court of Nanjing: Recently, media reported that according to the “Head of Robot Project of the Nanjing Intermediate People’s Courtâ€, our institute decided to “introduce intelligent robots†in 2017 to improve the quality of case handling and case efficiency. . After investigation, our hospital has never been set up, and we have not planned to set up a "Robot Project Department" yet. We have not appointed a "robot project leader." The reporter’s report was false. In recent years, our institute has continued to strengthen the construction of informatization, giving full play to the important role of informatization construction in serving the people, serving the trials, and administering the administration of justice. However, we also deeply realize that the judiciary is a job with experience and value judgment. No smarter machine or software can completely replace the judge's work. It can only provide judges with case support and assistance. In order to promote their products, individual companies fabricated the project of introducing “legal robots†in our institute, and also told reporters that the “project department†was set up in our institute, which caused a lot of controversy. Here, our hospital solemnly declares: 1. Our hospital does not have this so-called "legal robot" project, has not been established, currently has no intention to set up a "project department", and has not appointed a "project department head." 2. Our institute has formulated the "Three-Year Development Plan for Nanjing Court Information Construction (2017-2019)", which is promoting the transformation and upgrading of informatization construction, striving to provide the people with more quality, efficient, convenient and low-cost justice. service. 3. During the process of informatization construction in our institute, we will strictly follow the regulations for bidding for social service projects, and eliminate enterprises that have taken unfair competition as a rule to win the bid.
Vacuum Cleaner Ac Dry-Wet Motor
Vacuum Cleaner Ac Dry-Wet Motor,Vacuum Electric Cleaner Ac Motor,Wet Dry Vacuum Cleaner Motor,Wet And Dry Vacuum Cleaner Motor
Zhoushan Chenguang Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. , https://www.vacuum-cleaner-motors.com